Oral rehabilitation with extra-narrow osseointegrated implants in a young patient with agenesis of the upper lateral incisors: case report with 19-month follow-up
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19478398Palavras-chave:
Dental Implants, Anodontia, Planning, Dental ProsthesisResumo
Current osseointegrated implants have high success rates in rehabilitative treatments, even in challenging cases, thanks to advances in computed tomography, virtual planning, surgical techniques, biomaterials, and implant macrogeometry. This study aimed to report a clinical case of upper lateral incisor rehabilitation with extra-narrow implants using guided surgery with the hybrid technique. An 18-year-old patient with agenesis of the upper lateral incisors, previously treated with temporary implants, underwent scanning of the upper arch for virtual planning and surgical guide fabrication. After explantation of the temporary implants, two extra-narrow implants (Ø 2.9 mm) were installed, followed by temporary restoration. After six months, Variobase® prosthetic abutments and zirconia crowns were installed. The patient was satisfied with the esthetic and functional results. Clinical and radiographic follow-up for 19 months showed adequate peri-implant bone and gingival maintenance. The proper three-dimensional positioning of the implants proved to be fundamental for the preservation of the crestal bone and the formation of papillae. It is concluded that extra-narrow implants are an effective and predictable alternative for the rehabilitation of areas with reduced mesiodistal space and low masticatory demand, especially in the replacement of upper lateral incisors and lower incisors.
Referências
AL-JOHANY, S. S.; AL AMRI, M. D.; ALSAEED, S.; ALALOLA, B. Dental implant length and diameter: a proposed classification scheme. Journal of Prosthodontics, v. 26, n. 3, p. 252-260, 2016. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12517.
ATTIA, S.; SCHAAF, H.; EL KHASSAWNA, T. et al. Oral rehabilitation of hypodontia patients using an endosseous dental implant: functional and aesthetic results. Journal of Clinical Medicine, v. 8, n. 10, p. 1687, 2019. DOI: 10.3390/jcm8101687.
BORDIN, D.; BERGAMO, E. T. P.; FARDIN, V. P.; COELHO, P. G.; BONFANTE, E. A. Fracture strength and probability of survival of narrow and extra-narrow dental implants after fatigue testing: in vitro and in silico analysis. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, v. 71, p. 244-249, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.03.022.
CASAÑA-RUIZ, M. D.; CATALÀ-PIZARRO, M.; BORRÁS-AVIÑÓ, C. et al. Implants as a treatment alternative in children with multiple agenesis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, v. 15, n. 4, p. e324-e337, 2023. DOI: 10.4317/jced.60168.
CHEN, P.; NIKOYAN, L. Guided implant surgery: a technique whose time has come. Dental Clinics of North America, v. 65, n. 1, p. 67-80, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2020.09.005.
CHRCANOVIC, B. R. Dental implants in patients with ectodermal dysplasia: a systematic review. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, v. 46, n. 8, p. 1211-1217, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.05.038.
COPE, J. B.; MCFADDEN, D. Temporary replacement of missing maxillary lateral incisors with orthodontic miniscrew implants in growing patients: rationale, clinical technique, and long-term results. Journal of Orthodontics, v. 41, supl. 1, p. S62-S74, 2014. DOI: 10.1179/1465313314Y.0000000112.
DE-MARCHI, L. M.; PINI, N. I.; PASCOTTO, R. C. The relationship between smile attractiveness and esthetic parameters of patients with lateral agenesis treated with tooth recontouring or implants. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry, v. 4, p. 43-49, 2012. DOI: 10.2147/CCIDEN.S37668.
ESQUIVEL, J.; MEDA, R. G.; BLATZ, M. B. The impact of 3D implant position on emergence profile design. The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, v. 41, n. 1, p. 79-86, 2021. DOI: 10.11607/prd.5126.
FERREIRA, F. N. H.; MOREIRA NETO, J. J. S.; DE NEGREIROS, W. A.; KURITA, L. M.; SILVA, P. G. B. Evaluation of extra-narrow diameter implants in the oral rehabilitation of young patients after oral trauma: a prospective study. Dental Traumatology, v. 39, n. 3, p. 248-256, 2023. DOI: 10.1111/edt.12822.
GANZ, S. D. Three-dimensional imaging and guided surgery for dental implants. Dental Clinics of North America, v. 59, n. 2, p. 265-290, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2014.11.001.
GASTALDO, J. F.; CURY, P. R.; SENDYK, W. R. Effect of the vertical and horizontal distances between adjacent implants and between a tooth and an implant on the incidence of interproximal papilla. Journal of Periodontology, v. 75, n. 9, p. 1242-1246, 2004. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2004.75.9.1242.
GOYAL, S.; MASOOD, M.; LE, C. et al. Comparative bone graft evaluation for dental implant success: an evidence-based review. Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, v. 31, n. 3, p. 33-44, 2021. DOI: 10.1615/JlongTermEffMedImplants.2021038292.
GUPTA, S.; MORTELLARO, C.; PANDA, S. et al. Dental implant survival rate in irradiated and non-radiated patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents, v. 35, n. 2, supl. 1, p. 53-65, 2021. DOI: 10.23812/21-2supp1-5.
GUTIERRES, E.; BERGAMO, E. T. P.; CARVALHO, L. F. et al. Single geometry abutment for narrow and extra-narrow implant systems: survival and failure modes. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, v. 143, p. 105872, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105872.
HEIMES, D.; BECKER, P.; PABST, A. et al. How does dental implant macrogeometry affect primary implant stability? A narrative review. International Journal of Implant Dentistry, v. 9, n. 1, p. 20, 2023. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-023-00485-z.
JACOBS, R.; SALMON, B.; CODARI, M.; HASSAN, B.; BORNSTEIN, M. M. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use. BMC Oral Health, v. 18, n. 1, p. 88, 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-018-0523-5.
KLEIN, M. O.; SCHIEGNITZ, E.; AL-NAWAS, B. Systematic review on success of narrow-diameter dental implants. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, v. 29, supl., p. 43-54, 2014. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g1.3.
KRIEGER, O.; MATULIENE, G.; HÜSLER, J. et al. Failures and complications in patients with birth defects restored with fixed dental prostheses and single crowns on teeth and/or implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research, v. 20, n. 8, p. 809-816, 2009. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01720.x.
LAMBERT, F.; BOTILDE, G.; LECLOUX, G.; ROMPEN, E. Effectiveness of temporary implants in teenage patients: a prospective clinical trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research, v. 28, n. 9, p. 1152-1157, 2017. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12931.
MARCANTONIO, E. JÚNIOR et al. Influence of risk factors on the long-term survival of oral rehabilitation with extra-narrow implants: a retrospective study. Journal of Applied Oral Science, v. 30, e20220089, 2022. DOI: 10.1590/1678-77572022-0089.
MOSTOWSKA, A.; BIEDZIAK, B.; JAGODZINSKI, P. P. Novel MSX1 mutation in a family with autosomal-dominant hypodontia of second premolars and third molars. Archives of Oral Biology, v. 57, n. 6, p. 790-795, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.01.003.
REIS, T. A. D.; ZANCOPÉ, K.; KARAM, F. K.; NEVES, F. D. D. Biomechanical behavior of extra-narrow implants after fatigue and pull-out tests. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, v. 122, n. 1, p. 54.e1-54.e6, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.04.005.
SMITH NOBREGA, A. et al. Irradiated patients and survival rate of dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, v. 116, n. 6, p. 858-866, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.04.025.
SMITKARN, P.; SUBBALEKHA, K.; MATTHEOS, N.; PIMKHAOKHAM, A. The accuracy of single-tooth implants placed using fully digital-guided surgery and freehand implant surgery. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, v. 46, n. 9, p. 949-957, 2019. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13160.
TARNOW, D. P.; CHO, S. C.; WALLACE, S. S. The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of interimplant bone crest. Journal of Periodontology, v. 71, n. 4, p. 546-549, 2000. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.4.546.
TERHEYDEN, H.; WÜSTHOFF, F. Occlusal rehabilitation in patients with congenitally missing teeth: dental implants, conventional prosthetics, tooth autotransplants, and preservation of deciduous teeth—a systematic review. International Journal of Implant Dentistry, v. 1, n. 1, p. 30, 2015. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-015-0025-z.
THOMÉ, G.; VIANNA, C. P.; CALDAS, W. et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of maxillary lateral incisors rehabilitation using Morse taper connection extra-narrow implants at 12-month follow-up: a case report. Clinical Case Reports, v. 10, n. 8, e6248, 2022. DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.6248.
TUZZOLO NETO, H. et al. A comparative analysis of implants presenting different diameters: extra-narrow, narrow, and conventional. Materials, v. 13, n. 8, p. 1888, 2020. DOI: 10.3390/ma13081888.
VASTARDIS, H. et al. A human MSX1 homeodomain missense mutation causes selective tooth agenesis. Nature Genetics, v. 13, n. 4, p. 417-421, 1996. DOI: 10.1038/ng0896-417.
WIN, K. Z.; PIMKHAOKHAM, A.; KABOOSAYA, B. Comparing bone graft success, implant survival rate, and marginal bone loss: a retrospective study on materials and influential factors. Journal of Oral Implantology, v. 50, n. 4, p. 300-307, 2024. DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-23-00165.
