Integração ecológica na valoração ambiental: proposta conceitual do Ativo Ecológico Integrado (AEI)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19720261Palavras-chave:
Valoração Ambiental; Créditos de Carbono; Biodiversidade; Capital Natural; Integridade Ecológica.Resumo
A valoração ambiental permanece fragmentada entre métricas de carbono, ativos biológicos produtivos, contabilização de capital natural e créditos de biodiversidade, limitando a capacidade dos instrumentos atuais de representar a complexidade ecológica. Este artigo analisou criticamente esses quatro eixos por meio de uma revisão integrativa, estruturada pela estratégia SALSA, com o objetivo de identificar convergências, lacunas e potenciais de integração conceitual. Os resultados evidenciam que tais instrumentos operam de forma isolada e não capturam simultaneamente carbono, biodiversidade, integridade ecológica, serviços ecossistêmicos e risco socioambiental. Com base nessa síntese, propõe-se o Ativo Ecológico Integrado (AEI), uma unidade multimétrica capaz de articular essas dimensões em um mesmo arranjo de valoração. Conclui-se que o AEI oferece uma estrutura promissora para alinhar políticas públicas, mercados ambientais e práticas corporativas a metas de conservação e desenvolvimento sustentável.
Referências
BRASIL. Ministério do Meio Ambiente; INSTITUTO CHICO MENDES DE CONSERVAÇÃO DA BIODIVERSIDADE (ICMBIO). Lista Nacional Oficial de Espécies da Fauna Ameaçadas de Extinção. Brasília: MMA/ICMBio, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/icmbio/pt-br/assuntos/biodiversidade/fauna-brasileira/portarias-fauna-ameacada. Acesso em: 26 nov. 2025.
BEBBINGTON, Jan; ÖSTERBLOM, Henrik; CRUTZEN, Paul et al. Accounting and sustainable development: reflections and propositions. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, v. 33, n. 7, 2020.
CAMPOS-LLERENA, P. et al. Biological assets in agricultural accounting: a systematic review of the application of IAS 41. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, v. 18, n. 7, art. 380, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18070380.
CAPITALS COALITION. Natural Capital Protocol. London: Capitals Coalition, 2021. Disponível em: https://capitalscoalition.org/capitals-approach/natural-capital-protocol/. Acesso em: 20 nov. 2025.
CBD (CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY). Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. Montréal: CBD Secretariat, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.cbd.int/gbf/. Acesso em: 20 nov. 2025.
COMITÊ DE PRONUNCIAMENTOS CONTÁBEIS (CPC). CPC 29 – Ativo Biológico e Produto Agrícola. Brasília: CPC, 2009. Disponível em: http://static.cpc.aatb.com.br/Documentos/324_CPC_29_rev%2013.pdf. Acesso em: 13 abr. 2026.
COSTANZA, R. et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, v. 387, p. 253-260, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0.
CROCI, E. Biodiversity credits schemes: a comparative analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 523, p. 146382, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146382.
GRAY, R. Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability… and how would we know?. Accounting, Organizations and Society, v. 35, n. 1, 2010.
HLAVÁČKOVÁ, P. Forest as a biological asset: an accounting and tax perspective in the Czech Republic. Journal of Forest Science, v. 71, n. 7, p. 279-286, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/31/2025-JFS.
INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD (IASB). IAS 41: Agriculture. London: IFRS Foundation, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/publications/pdf-standards/english/2021/issued/part-a/ias-41-agriculture.pdf. Acesso em: 13 abr. 2026.
INSTITUTO CHICO MENDES DE CONSERVAÇÃO DA BIODIVERSIDADE (ICMBIO). Livro Vermelho da Fauna Brasileira Ameaçada de Extinção. Brasília: ICMBio/MMA, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/icmbio/pt-br/centrais-de-conteudo/publicacoes/publicacoes-diversas/livro-vermelho/livro-vermelho-da-fauna-brasileira-ameacada-de-extincao-2018. Acesso em: 26 nov. 2025.
INTEGRITY COUNCIL FOR THE VOLUNTARY CARBON MARKET (ICVCM). Core Carbon Principles and Assessment Framework. London: ICVCM, 2023. Disponível em: https://icvcm.org/core-carbon-principles/. Acesso em: 15 out. 2025.
INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE (IUCN). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2023-3. Gland: IUCN, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.iucnredlist.org. Acesso em: 26 nov. 2025.
IPBES. Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Summary for Policymakers. Bonn: IPBES, 2019. Disponível em: https://ipbes.net/global-assessment. Acesso em: 15 out. 2025.
IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. Disponível em: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg3/. Acesso em: 15 out. 2025.
IPCC. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/. Acesso em: 15 out. 2025.
IPCC. Sixth Assessment Report: Synthesis Report. Genebra: IPCC, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/. Acesso em: 15 out. 2025.
JONES, M.; SOLOMON, J. Problematising accounting for biodiversity. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, v. 26, n. 5, 2013.
KIM, E.-H. et al. Towards high-integrity biodiversity credits: balancing commensurability, ecological complexity and governance. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2025.0990.
KOLLERT, W.; LANDSBERG, J. Carbon markets, forest plantations and biodiversity: challenges and opportunities. Forest Policy and Economics, v. 131, p. 102122, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102122.
KREMEN, C.; MERENLENDER, A. M. Landscapes that work for biodiversity and people. Science, v. 362, n. 6412, eaau6020, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau6020.
LIU, J. et al. Integrating ecological risk into corporate natural capital accounting. Ecological Economics, v. 215, p. 107998, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.107998.
MAECHLER, E.; BOISVERT, V. Performing nature’s valuation: the art of natural capital accounting. Ecological Economics, v. 212, p. 107929, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107929.
MANDLE, L. et al. Natural capital accounting reveals ecosystems’ role in water and energy security in Colombia’s Sinú Basin. Communications Earth & Environment, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02254-9.
NARDI, P. C. C.; SILVA, R. L. M. IAS 41 and biological assets in Brazil: is the information really useful? Revista Catarinense da Ciência Contábil, v. 22, e3365, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16930/2237-7662/rccc.v22e3365.
NATURAL CAPITAL PROJECT. Natural Capital: Valuing Nature in Policy and Finance. Stanford: Stanford University, 2024. Disponível em: https://naturalcapitalproject.stanford.edu/. Acesso em: 25 nov. 2025.
OECD. Scaling up biodiversity-positive incentives: delivering on target 18 of the global biodiversity framework. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/19b859ce-en.
PHELPS, J.; WEBB, E. L.; AGRAWAL, A. Does REDD+ threaten to recentralize forest governance? Science, v. 328, n. 5976, p. 312-313, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1187774.
POLLINATION GROUP. State of voluntary biodiversity credit markets: a global review of biodiversity credit schemes. 2023. Disponível em: https://pollinationgroup.com/insights/state-of-voluntary-biodiversity-credit-markets-2023. Acesso em: 25 nov. 2025.
RENWICK, A. R. et al. Biodiverse planting for carbon and biodiversity on indigenous land. PLoS ONE, v. 9, n. 3, e91281, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091281.
SEYMOUR, F.; HARRIS, N. L. Reducing tropical deforestation. Science, v. 365, n. 6455, p. 756-757, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax8546.
SNYDER, H. Literature review as a research methodology: an overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, v. 104, p. 333-339, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.
TEDERSOO, L. et al. Towards a co-crediting system for carbon and biodiversity. Plants, People, Planet, v. 6, n. 1, p. 18-28, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10405.
TORRACO, R. J. Writing integrative literature reviews: guidelines for synthesis. Human Resource Development Review, v. 4, n. 3, p. 356-367, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283.
TORRACO, R. J. Writing integrative literature reviews: using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, v. 15, n. 4, p. 404-428, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606.
UNEP-WCMC. Carbon and biodiversity: key relationships. Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC, 2020. Disponível em: https://www.unep-wcmc.org/resources-and-data/carbon-and-biodiversity. Acesso em: 25 nov. 2025.
UNITED NATIONS. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting – Ecosystem Accounting (SEEA EA). New York: United Nations, 2021. Disponível em: https://seea.un.org/ecosystem-accounting. Acesso em: 13 abr. 2026.
UNITED NATIONS. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations, 2015. Disponível em: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda. Acesso em: 26 nov. 2025.
UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME (UNEP). Making peace with nature: a scientific blueprint to tackle the climate, biodiversity and pollution emergencies. Nairobi: UNEP, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.unep.org/resources/making-peace-nature. Acesso em: 25 nov. 2025.
UNFCCC. Synthesis report of the first global stocktake. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2023. Disponível em: https://unfccc.int/documents/631600. Acesso em: 13 abr. 2026.
VARDON, M. et al. Using natural capital accounting for biodiversity offset policy: a case study from the Australian Capital Territory. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, v. 25, p. 100687, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100687.
WAUCHOPE, H. S. et al. What is a unit of nature? Measurement challenges in the emerging biodiversity credit market. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, v. 291, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2024.2353.
WHITTEMORE, R.; KNAFL, K. The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, v. 52, n. 5, p. 546-553, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x.
WORLD BANK. State and trends of carbon pricing 2023. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/39796.
WORLD BANK; UNITED NATIONS STATISTICS DIVISION (UNSD). The Changing Wealth of Nations 2018: Building a Sustainable Future. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1046-6.
WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM. Biodiversity credits: demand analysis and market outlook. Genebra: WEF, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.weforum.org/reports/biodiversity-credits-demand-analysis-and-market-outlook/. Acesso em: 25 nov. 2025.
WUNDER, S. et al. Biodiversity credits: an overview of the current state, future opportunities, and potential pitfalls. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70018.
YANG, E. W. From carbon credits to an expanded payment for ecosystem services scheme: a case study of the Valuta voor Veen Project in the Netherlands. Wageningen: Wageningen University, 2025. Disponível em: https://edepot.wur.nl/689949. Acesso em: 25 nov. 2025.
